Connected Connected
Back to kit
Sample Therapist Report. This is a realistic mock generated from a fictional couple. Real reports are produced by the couple themselves from inside the app and shared with their clinician. Click Print / Save as PDF above to see how it prints.
Connected
Therapist Report
Couple:  S.R. & M.K.
Date range:  Feb 24 – Apr 18, 2026 (8 weeks)
Prepared for:  Dr. Jane Rivera, LMFT
Generated:  Apr 18, 2026, 7:42pm
Connection Score
72 / 100 ▲ +8 pts vs Week 1
Daily Practice Adherence
42 / 56 days 75% · stable
Both answered One answered Missed

Thematic summary

Recurring
In-law boundary dynamics (M.K.'s mother). Referenced in 5 separate daily exchanges and tied to 2 unresolved conflicts (Mar 7, Apr 3). S.R. consistently frames this as a boundary question; M.K. frames it as a loyalty conflict.
Surfaced primarily on Wednesdays and Sundays (typical contact days).
Recurring
Financial stress / home purchase timeline. 8 daily exchanges reference this directly, with divergence on "ready" timelines — S.R.: this year; M.K.: 18–24 months.
Not yet a conflict event, but appearing in appreciation inversions.
Emerging +
Playful references to shared future. Increased 3× in the last 2 weeks (e.g. naming future dog, planning anniversary trip). Emerging after Week 6 — possibly corresponds to the Week 5 conflict repair.
Small signal, worth tracking.

Conflict log

Feb 28
Disagreement about weekend plans — differing needs (S.R. social, M.K. solo recharge)
Resolved same day
Mar 7
M.K.'s mother — boundary around unannounced visits
Unresolved
Mar 15
Spending — unexpected bill during ongoing home-purchase savings push
Unresolved
Mar 22
Division of travel-prep tasks — brief repair during drive home
Repaired
Apr 3
M.K.'s mother (recurring) — M.K. expressed feeling caught between partner and mother
Unresolved
Apr 14
Differing timelines for major decisions (marriage, home, kids) surfacing in parallel
In progress

Appreciation ratio

Gottman 5:1
0:1 Current: 3.8 : 1 6.6:1

Ratio of positive to negative daily exchanges. Currently below Gottman's 5:1 benchmark for stable couples. Most shortfall traces to M.K.'s verbal appreciation frequency (1.4 avg. vs 3.2 for S.R.).

Love Map completion

S.R. knows M.K.
62%
M.K. knows S.R.
48%

Asymmetric — 14pt gap. Gap concentrated in S.R.'s origin family and current work-life domains. Possible curiosity work for M.K.

Suggested focus for next session

  1. In-law boundary repair. Recurring unresolved (Mar 7, Apr 3). M.K. is the bridge — loyalty-bind framing may be productive. EFT-style softening likely needed before boundary problem-solving lands.
  2. Timeline narrative. Apr 14 conflict (home + marriage + kids) surfaced as a cluster. Worth separating the three decisions and surfacing underlying fears/hopes before bargaining over dates.
  3. M.K.'s appreciation practice. Ratio gap is the single highest-leverage intervention per Gottman data. Specific prompts this week around naming one thing S.R. did daily that went unacknowledged.